MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408976149 · doi:10.1093/jhps/hnaf011.059

FP6.13 Minimum 25 year followup of patients treated with Periacetabular Osteotomy: The Boston Experience

2025· article· en· W4408976149 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael B. Millis, Ani Maroyan, Luke C Mendola, Travis Matheney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hip Preservation Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryOsteotomyGeneral surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a non-arthroplasty treatment for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia (DDH). The literature regarding long-term patient outcomes after PAO remains limited. We report our evaluation of patients treated by PAO 25 to 33 years ago to identify factors associated with durable therapeutic success. Materials and Methods: 141 patients with 173 dysplastic hips underwent PAO from 8/1/91 to 12/31/98 by a single surgeon. 6 patients died. 29 patients (31 hips) could not be located. 6 pts (12 hips) were contacted but did not yet return questionnaires. 124 hips in 100 patients were retrospectively evaluated at a minimum of 25 years/maximum of 33 years post-operatively. Hips were evaluated with use of the WOMAC Pain scale Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index postoperatively. Osteotomy “failure” was defined as a pain score of >/=10 or the need for total hip arthroplasty. Results: Of 124 hips in 100 patients analyzed from our cohort, 62 hips (50%) were minimally- or asymptomatic with a preserved hip. 53 hips in 48 patients) (43%%) had undergone hip replacement (THR). 9 hips (7%)) were symptomatic (WOMAC pain>10) with a preserved hip. Patients in the THR group were older than asymptomatic patients (54 ± 8 years vs. 50 ± 11 years; p=0.08). Most patients were female (83%). 89% of hip replacement patients were female. Conclusions: Long-term follow-up of patients treated with PAO for symptomatic dysplasia suggests most at long-term follow-up report high levels of function, although 41% had required THR. Most who required THR also reported high levels of function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hip Preservation SurgerySame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207