MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408976599 · doi:10.1093/jhps/hnaf011.297

EP6.8 Do sagittal spinopelvic parameters impact outcomes following arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement? - A systematic review

2025· review· en· W4408976599 on OpenAlexaff
Yoan Bourgeault‐Gagnon, Joshua A.J. Keogh, Isabelle Keng, João Dinis, Mohamed Sarraj, Vincent Milantoni, Olufemi R. Ayeni

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hip Preservation Surgery · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFemoroacetabular impingementMedicineSagittal planeSurgeryOrthodonticsRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a prevalent cause of hip pain in young adults, with 10-20% of patients expressing dissatisfaction after surgery. Stemming from arthroplasty literature, recent studies have examined the influence of spinopelvic balance and its related parameters on postoperative outcomes in FAI, encountering mixed results and using diverse terminology. Purpose: To assess the relationship between spinopelvic parameters and outcomes six months or more after hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus from their respective inception dates up to January 11, 2024. This search targeted articles with a level of evidence 4 or higher that assessed the relationship between static or dynamic spinopelvic parameters and postoperative outcomes in hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, two reviewers independently screened the articles for eligibility, extracted relevant data for analysis, and assessed their methodological quality using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score. A descriptive and qualitative analysis of the results was conducted. Results: Of the 1609 articles screened, 6 studies involving 531 patients (mean 88.5; range 35 to 200) were included in this review. The mean age of participants was 33.83 (range 30.2 to 39.4) years, with 54.3% (range 26.20 to 68.50%) male, over an average follow-up of 13.12 (range 6 to 27.6) months. All included studies had a level of evidence of III or IV. Four studies examined static and two assessed dynamic spinopelvic parameters. Two studies reported statistically worse outcomes after FAI surgery in at least one patient reported outcome score or category in patients with greater anterior pelvic tilt. No statistically significant relationship was observed with pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis or sacral slope. One study found that patients with restricted pelvic-lumbar mobility, as measured with a physical examination maneuver, had worse absolute postoperative outcomes. Conclusion: Increased anterior pelvic tilt may correlate with marginally poorer postoperative outcomes in FAI surgery. This review underscores the potential benefits of assessing spinopelvic balance to enhance surgical results, although evidence remains sparse, highlighting the need for further research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.010
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hip Preservation SurgerySame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207