MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408976646 · doi:10.1093/jhps/hnaf011.308

EP6.19 CT imaging findings in symptomatic FAI: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4408976646 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Deniz Ince, Kyle P. O’Connor, John C. Clohisy, Jeffrey J. Nepple, Michael D. Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hip Preservation Surgery · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiologyMedical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a leading cause of hip pain in young adults and a cause of osteoarthritis. Despite the prevalence of FAI, patients often experience delays in diagnosis and variable use of CT imaging in their diagnostic testing. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review on FAI patients to examine which CT radiographic values are most closely associated with symptom development and poorer outcomes to identify the key CT findings that can increase timely diagnosis and accurate treatment expectations. Methods: We screened PubMed, SCOPUS, OVID Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov for literature on CT morphology in FAI. Patient demographics, CT data, intraoperative findings, and patient reported outcomes were recorded. An assessment of each paper’s quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and only papers scoring >7 points (“good” quality) were included in our systematic review. Results: 21 studies with 1,503 hips at an average of 38.4 years were included in this systematic review. 52.7% were female and average BMI was 25.11 Kg/m2. Five studies reported follow-up at minimum 1 or 2 years, and four studies reported intraoperative findings. Thirteen studies reported alpha angles. Eight studies reported lateral center edge angles (LCEA), with two studies reporting significant differences compared to mean in pincer morphology. Fourteen studies reported acetabulum morphology, ten studies reported femoral morphology, and two studies reported pelvic tilt. Alpha angles, specifically between the 1 o’clock and 2 o’clock position on the femoral clockface, were consistently significantly greater in symptomatic cam-FAI compared to asymptomatic cam morphology and controls. Three of four studies reporting femoral neck-shaft angle found significantly lower angles in symptomatic cam-FAI compared to asymptomatic cam morphology and controls. Conclusion: Greater cam deformity was associated with greater extent of labral tearing and worse postsurgical patient reported outcomes when coupled with location near 1:30 o’clock on the femoral clockface. Symptomatic cam-FAI demonstrated lower femoral head-neck angles compared to asymptomatic hips that otherwise had cam morphology. Greater LCEA in pincer morphology was associated with worse postsurgical patient reported outcomes. These three CT radiographic data have diagnostic and prognostic value for FAI patients across multiple studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hip Preservation SurgerySame topicMedical Imaging and Pathology StudiesFrench-language works237,207