The Nrf2-Keap1/ARE signaling pathway in aquatic animals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The complex and fluctuating conditions of aquatic ecosystems make aquatic organisms vulnerable to oxidative stress. The Nrf2-Keap1/ARE signaling pathway serves as an important intracellular defense mechanism, particularly for aquatic organisms exposed to environmental stressors and toxic substances. Environmental stimuli can disrupt an organism's internal redox balance, leading to cellular oxidative stress responses. To counteract these effects, cells develop intricate defense mechanisms, with the Nrf2-Keap1/ARE signaling pathway is playing a crucial role. In this pathway, the nuclear transcription factor Nrf2 translocates into the nucleus to initiate the transcription of antioxidant genes, thereby reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced cellular damage and maintaining the organism's oxidative-antioxidative equilibrium. While research on this pathway in mammals is well-established, studies on aquatic organisms are still limited. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the regulatory functions of the Nrf2-Keap1/ARE pathway on oxidative stress and delves into the molecular structures of Nrf2, Keap1, and ARE, offering insights into the physiological regulation of antioxidant defenses in aquatic organisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".