MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408992092 · doi:10.17816/vto631490

The influence of general and regional anesthesia on cognitive status in elderly and senile patients undergoing primary and revision arthroplasty of lower limb joints

2025· article· en· W4408992092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Konstantin Yu. Ukolov, Tat’yana Vladimirovna Sokolova

Bibliographic record

VenueN N Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineArthroplastyCognitionLower limbAnesthesiaSurgeryPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Recently, the impact of general anaesthesia on the patient's cognitive state has been increasingly discussed. The detrimental effects of the general anaesthetic components can be clinically manifested in the form of impaired memory, coordination and attention, as well as in the development of delirium, which increases postoperative mortality. AIM: To evaluate the influence of methods of general anaesthesia and the combination of regional anaesthesia and intravenous sedation on the development of early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in older and elderly patients undergoing surgery for endoprosthesis of large joints of the lower limb, such as knee and hip joints. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-blind, randomized study was conducted in 122 aged patients with orthopedic pathology of the lower limb joints undergoing treatment in the Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Otrhopaedics. The effect of general anesthesia and its components in combination with spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine or levobupivacaine on the development of cognitive impairment in the early postoperative period was assessed using the Montreal Mental Status Assessment Scale MoCA. RESULTS: Postoperative delirium developed in 3.3% of patients in the spinal anaesthesia group with intravenous midazolam sedation, early postoperative cognitive dysfunction developed in 26.7% of patients in the spinal anaesthesia group with intravenous midazolam and diazepam sedation, and in 16.7% of patients in the dexmedetomidine group with intravenous dexmedetomidine sedation. In the sevoflurane general anaesthesia group, the incidence of cognitive impairment was significantly higher than in the spinal anaesthesia groups: postoperative delirium developed in 6.3% of patients, and postoperative cognitive dysfunction was found in 50% of older and elderly patients. CONCLUSION: The use of spinal anaesthesia with intravenous sedation with benzodiazepines or dexmedetomidine has a significantly lower effect on the incidence of early postoperative cognitive impairment compared with general anaesthesia with sevoflurane in elderly and older patients undergoing major joint replacement surgery. Intravenous sedation with dexmedetomidine is preferable to spinal anaesthesia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueN N Priorov Journal of Traumatology and OrthopedicsSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207