Bibliographic record
Abstract
From his nationalist point of view, the jokes of the newly elected president of the United States in his second term may not be wrong. They could be therapy from a few decades ago. The same idea of conditioning the life of the continents with one’s version of events dates to the post-Soviet era. On the other hand, the idea of making America great but at whose expense? We have no doubt that the reactions to the prima donna behavior are not only obsolete but stale, so much so that in an era in which the agreement and economic union between democratic states prevails, it could seem that the objections to the decisions that the new president airs with media frenzy, if implemented, will create opposition, even internally. So, despite the preliminary attempts at agreement, the enigmatic plan of the new president will find at least part or much of its space on the world stage. Of course, there is also the option “let’s see”. That is, to start the operational phase and observe the concrete and effective reaction of the markets, for now not so much the transitory one of the EU governments. It is difficult to believe that in 2000 an offensive on the basis of tariffs launched by the leading nation could be followed by a counter-reaction of the countries subjected to the use of the same surcharges, but if this were to happen, the dual use of tariffs as a measure and countermeasure at the same time could last a long time. With a golden age behind rather than ahead, it seems hard to find a convenient arrangement for the survival of a new Gaza Strip and to avoid a war in the future. Neighboring countries have opposed the idea of a US management, but a temporary United Nations administration could be different…. It is time to change the evaluation paradigm at the global level. President Trump’s abrupt proposal for Canada to join the Union, to avoid tariffs, becoming the fifty-first state of the United States is shocking and beyond any diplomatic declination, but it could be the expression of a future convergence of neighboring territories in America and elsewhere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.075 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".