MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408997559 · doi:10.1111/apha.70035

Uteroplacental microvascular remodeling in health and disease

2025· review· en· W4408997559 on OpenAlexaff
Ruizhi Li, Lei Ma, Xiaoxue Chen, Jiaxi Zhu, Hong Zhu, Dong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Physiologica · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Science Foundation of QingdaoNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDiseaseMedicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The microvascular system is essential for delivering oxygen and nutrients to tissues while removing metabolic waste. During pregnancy, the uteroplacental microvascular system undergoes extensive remodeling to meet the increased demands of the fetus. Key adaptations include vessel dilation and increases in vascular volume, density, and permeability, all of which ensure adequate placental perfusion while maintaining stable maternal blood pressure. Structural and functional abnormalities in the uteroplacental microvasculature are associated with various gestational complications, posing both immediate and long-term risks to the health of both mother and infant. In this review, we describe the changes in uteroplacental microvessels during pregnancy, discuss the pathogenic mechanisms underlying diseases such as preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and gestational diabetes, and summarize current clinical and research approaches for monitoring microvascular health. We also provide an update on research models for gestational microvascular complications and explore solutions to several unresolved challenges. With advancements in research techniques, we anticipate significant progress in understanding and managing these diseases, ultimately leading to new therapeutic strategies to improve maternal and fetal health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa PhysiologicaSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207