MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408999143 · doi:10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_26_25

Effectiveness of proprioceptive integration on sensory-specific balance training in osteoarthritis: a randomized control trial

2025· article· en· W4408999143 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mahendran Mani Madasami, Gunjan Kumar, Mahesh Alias Vibhav Milind Sanzgiri

Bibliographic record

VenueMGM Journal of Medical Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProprioceptionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationBalance (ability)Sensory systemRandomized controlled trialOsteoarthritisBalance trainingPhysical therapyMedicinePsychologyNeuroscienceAlternative medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative condition and one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders, primarily affecting the knee joint. It is characterized by progressive joint deterioration, leading to pain, stiffness, and functional impairment. Proprioceptive training has emerged as a therapeutic approach to enhance joint position sense and address balance deficits in OA patients. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of sensory-specific balance training with proprioceptive integration compared to conventional occupational therapy in improving balance, proprioception, and functional outcomes in individuals with knee OA. Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at a College of Occupational Therapy, enrolling 30 participants diagnosed with knee OA. The participants were randomly assigned to either a control group receiving standard occupational therapy sessions or an experimental group undergoing proprioceptive integration with sensory-specific balance exercises. Outcome measures included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the adult sensory profile, which were assessed before and after the intervention. Results: The experimental group significantly improved WOMAC scores, particularly in pain, stiffness, and physical function domains. Additionally, BBS and proprioception outcomes showed greater enhancement in the experimental group compared to the control group, which exhibited minimal changes with conventional therapy. Conclusion: Proprioceptive integration, particularly sensory-specific balance training, is an effective intervention for enhancing balance, proprioception, and functional outcomes in knee OA patients. It is a valuable complement to traditional therapies and can potentially improve affected individuals’ quality of life and overall physical functioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMGM Journal of Medical SciencesSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207