MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409001810 · doi:10.18280/acsm.490101

Preparation and Evaluation Recycling Waste Polymers Composites

2025· article· fr· W4409001810 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Usama J. Naeem, Nuha Hadi Jasim Al Hasan, Sundus Khaleel Alfaiz, Mohammed Ali Jaber, Ahmed J. Mohammed, Safaa A. S. Almtori, M. A. Mohammed

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRecycling and Waste Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComposite materialMaterials sciencePolymerWaste managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, polymeric waste materials such as tires and PVC waste have been exploited in the manufacturing of industrial speed bumps.Tires were processed into granules of approximately 0.185 mm, and PVC waste was reduced to granules with a size of about 0.275 mm.These prepared granules were combined with silicone rubber and a hardening agent to form a cohesive binder.Different prototypes were then crafted using varied proportions of tire to PVC waste specifically, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%.These prototypes underwent rigorous testing to evaluate their thermal conductivity coefficient, Shore A hardness, and compressive strength.It was observed that the prototype with a mix of 40% tire waste and 20% PVC waste exhibited the highest thermal conductivity.For hardness, the combination of 40% tire waste and 40% PVC waste achieved the highest Shore A value.However, the greatest compressive strength was exhibited by the prototype with a lower ratio of 10% tire waste to 10% PVC waste.Based on these results, the optimal compressive strengths of 2.25 MPa for the tire component and 2.12 MPa for the PVC.This composition was determined to be the most effective for the application envisioned in this work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicRecycling and Waste Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207