The nuclear poly(A)-binding protein Pab2/PABPN1 promotes heterochromatin assembly through the formation of Pab2 nuclear condensates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The assembly of constitutive heterochromatin is a prerequisite for maintaining genome stability. However, the mechanism of heterochromatin formation has yet to be completely understood. Here, we demonstrate a crucial role of the nuclear poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) Pab2/PABPN1 in promoting constitutive heterochromatin formation in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Histone H3 Lys 9 di- and tri-methylation, hallmarks of heterochromatin, are significantly reduced at centromeres in the absence of Pab2. Pab2 forms nuclear condensates through its RNA-recognition motif (RRM) and the intrinsically disordered domain (IDR), both of which bind to centromeric non-coding RNAs. Intriguingly, two key heterochromatin factors, the histone H3 Lys9 methyltransferase Clr4 and the Mi2-type chromatin remodeler Mit1, associate with centromeres in a Pab2-dependent manner. Pab2 interacts with two putative RNA-binding proteins, the ZC3H3 ortholog Red5 and the RBM26·27 ortholog Rmn1, both essential for heterochromatin formation. Deletion of the Pab2 N-terminal region, which disrupts this interaction, largely abolishes Pab2 function, underscoring the importance of this complex. Pab2 also associates and colocalizes with Ppn1 (a PPP1R10 ortholog), a component of the cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF) complex, and ppn1 mutations disrupt constitutive heterochromatin. Notably, both Ppn1 and Rmn1 are able to interact with Clr4. Our findings reveal that Pab2 plays a pivotal role in heterochromatin assembly by forming nuclear condensates through its RRM/IDR, and Pab2 condensates facilitate the recruitment of Clr4 and Mit1 to centromeres, potentially through its binding proteins, Ppn1 and Rmn1. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms underlying heterochromatin formation and highlights the importance of RNA-binding proteins and phase separation in this process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".