MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409013652 · doi:10.3138/ptc-2024-0042

Isokinetic Knee Muscle Strength Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients: A Comparison of In-Hospital Versus Private Clinic Rehabilitation

2025· article· en· W4409013652 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Lilly Groszman, Jean-François Girouard, Thierry Pauyo, Mark Burman, Mathieu Lalumière, Guy Grimard, Marie‐Lyne Nault, Paul A. Martineau, Louis‐Nicolas Veilleux

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiotherapy Canada · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineMcGill UniversityShriners Hospitals for Children - CanadaMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationMedicineAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionMuscle strengthAnterior cruciate ligamentPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To determine if rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACL-R) in a tertiary care paediatric orthopaedic centre (TPOC) yields superior outcomes compared to private clinic (PC) rehabilitation. Method: In this retrospective analysis, patients aged 13 to 18 years who underwent standardized isokinetic knee assessment 5 to 7 months after ACL-R were reviewed. Exclusion criteria: previous injury to the non-operated limb, neuromuscular musculoskeletal disorder, isolated meniscal repair, isolated meniscectomy, posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. To determine which of the two rehabilitation settings had the best outcomes, isokinetic parameters and patient-reported outcomes were compared between the TPOC and the PC groups using univariate analysis of variance. Results: Among 276 patients (63% female), 34 performed rehabilitation in a PC (12%) and 242 performed their rehabilitation in a TPOC (88%). Except “ACL graft used” ( p < 0.05), no significant difference was found in demographic variables between the two rehabilitation groups. Patients who attended the TPOC setting had significantly higher limb symmetry index in flexion at 180°/s ( p = 0.04), average relative peak torque in extension at 60°/s ( p = 0.03), z-score at 60°/s in extension ( p = 0.03), and total work at 60°/s in flexion ( p = 0.04) compared to the PC group. ACL Return to Sport after Injury Scale scores were superior for PC rehabilitation patients (mean 83 [SD 20]) compared to patients attending the TPOC (mean 70 [SD 18]) ( p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients managed in a TPOC have better isokinetic outcomes 6 to 7 months post-surgery compared to patients managed in a PC rehabilitation setting, which may suggest that the expertise and multidisciplinary nature of the TPOC favour rehabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiotherapy CanadaSame topicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesFrench-language works237,207