MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409018678 · doi:10.4271/2025-01-8023

RGB2BEV-Net: A PyTorch-Based End-to-End Pipeline for RGB to BEV Segmentation Using an Extended Dataset for Autonomous Driving

2025· article· en· W4409018678 on OpenAlexaff
Sabir Hossain, Xianke Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)Computer scienceEnd-to-end principleArtificial intelligenceRGB color modelSegmentationComputer visionImage segmentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">In this study, we introduce RGB2BEV-Net, an end-to-end pipeline that extends traditional BEV segmentation models by utilizing raw RGB images with Bird’s Eye View (BEV) generation. While previous work primarily focused on pre-segmented images to generate corresponding BEV maps, our approach expands this by collecting RGB images alongside their affiliated segmentation masks and BEV representations. This enables direct input of RGB camera sensors into the pipeline, reflecting real-world autonomous driving scenarios where RGB cameras are commonly used as sensors, rather than relying on pre-segmented images. Our model processes four RGB images through a segmentation layer before converting them into a segmented BEV, implemented in the PyTorch framework after being adapted from an original implementation that utilized a different framework. This adaptation was necessary to improve compatibility and ensure better integration of the entire system within autonomous vehicle applications. We evaluate the performance of RGB2BEV-Net on the newly extended dataset and present a detailed result analysis, compared to traditional pre-segmented approaches. The system demonstrates flexibility and potential applicability for use in next-generation ADAS and autonomous navigation systems.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207