MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409020463 · doi:10.1093/petrology/egaf030

Zircon Morphology and Geochemical Diversity During Closed-System Crystallization of the Skaergaard Intrusion

2025· article· en· W4409020463 on OpenAlexafffund
Nichole Moerhuis, James S. Scoates, Dominique Weis, R F J Scoates, Christian Tegner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsVancouver Island UniversityPacific Institute for the Mathematical SciencesUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsZirconGeologyGeochemistryIntrusionDiversity (politics)Layered intrusionCrystallizationMorphology (biology)PaleontologyChemical engineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The textures and chemistry of zircon in the Eocene Skaergaard intrusion, related to the East Greenland flood basalts and opening of the North Atlantic Ocean, are used to unravel a wide range of competing physicochemical processes in a shallow magma reservoir that cooled and crystallized as a closed system. This study involved detailed microscopy, SEM-cathodoluminescence imaging and LA-ICP-MS trace element analysis of zircon from mineral separates and directly in thin sections. Samples represent all major components of the Skaergaard intrusion, a suite of late granophyres and granophyric sills (Tinden, Sydtoppen), and hosting Precambrian gneiss. Zircon occurs primarily within interstitial crystalline pockets characterized by two distinct mineral assemblages that are related to crystallization from late-stage conjugate immiscible Si- and Fe-rich melts. Marked variations in zircon morphology occur throughout the intrusion. Large skeletal crystals, acicular needles, euhedral zircon with stubby or prismatic terminations, and wafer grains with feathery internal textures are typical of the Upper Border Series and Sandwich Horizon. In contrast, anhedral zircon with sector zoning is found throughout the Layered Series. Apatite, rutile, and thorite inclusions are abundant in Skaergaard zircon. Titanium-in-zircon temperatures for Skaergaard cumulates (total range = 579–861°C; Q1–Q3 = 711–777°C) and MELTS-modelled zircon saturation temperatures (790–845°C) for variable initial Zr concentrations indicate crystallization from highly fractionated near-solidus melts. The extremely variable abundance, morphology, and trace element chemistry (e.g. Th/U, Nb/Yb, Eu/Eu*, Ce/Nd, Yb/Dy) of Skaergaard zircon result from the combined effects of numerous processes. These include (1) crystallization of primocryst phases prior to zircon saturation, (2) extensive fractionation of interstitial melt, (3) late-stage liquid immiscibility in the consolidating cumulate pile, (4) disequilibrium crystallization triggered by late vapour saturation and volatile loss, (5) co-crystallization of accessory phases, and (6) secondary zircon growth as a result of the intrusion of the 660-m-thick Basistoppen sill above the just-solidified Sandwich Horizon. The remarkable morphological and geochemical diversity of zircon in the Skaergaard intrusion, unprecedented in the plutonic environment, demonstrates the critical role of distinct crystallization environments between the floor, walls, roof, and centre of the magma body during closed-system solidification of this sub-volcanic magma reservoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PetrologySame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207