MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409023783 · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.03.276

Influence of steam-rich environments on the high temperature tribological behavior of Inconel 718 for sustainable aviation

2025· article· en· W4409023783 on OpenAlexaff
Andre Renan Mayer, Yinyin Zhang, Pantcho Stoyanov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Research and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTribology and Wear Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersTaiho Kogyo Tribology Research Foundation
KeywordsInconelMaterials scienceTribologyAviationMetallurgyAerospace engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aerospace industry has been looking for solutions to minimize emissions of pollutants into the environment. In this direction, replacing fossil fuels is a promising strategy. The use of hydrogen as a fuel has been shown to be a promising alternative due to its cleaner combustion, with the potential to reduce harmful emissions. Hydrogen primarily produces water during combustion, which becomes steam at high temperatures inside a gas turbine engine. However, there is limited research on the behavior of nickel-based alloys, which are widely used in gas turbine engines, in hydrogen and steam-rich environments. The interactions between steam at tribological interfaces within these engines remain poorly studied. Therefore, this study investigates the high temperature tribological behavior of Inconel 718 under steam conditions. Experiments were conducted to understand the wear mechanisms and the effects of temperature and steam on Inconel 718, using an experimental setup for producing and applying superheated steam to the samples during the sliding test. Subsequent analyses were conducted with a 3D measuring laser microscope, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Raman spectroscopy. The results revealed that the coefficient of friction decreases with increasing temperature, while wear increases with temperature. Additionally, the presence of steam exhibited a mild influence on wear and friction characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Research and TechnologySame topicTribology and Wear AnalysisFrench-language works237,207