MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409034093 · doi:10.1093/omcr/omaf001

Oral contraceptive pill-induced esophagitis: a rare cause of pill esophagitis in a Rwandan woman

2025· article· en· W4409034093 on OpenAlexaff
Gordon P. Bensen, Matthew R Bryan, Esther Nishimwe, Bao Sean Nguyen, Kenechukwu Chudy‐Onwugaje

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford Medical Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPotassium and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePillLevonorgestrelOral contraceptive pillAdverse effectEsophagitisProton-pump inhibitorFamily planningEpigastric painInternal medicineGynecologyPopulationPharmacologyDiseaseVomiting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a case of oral contraceptive pill (OCP)-induced esophagitis in a 43-year-old Rwandan woman. She presented with epigastric and retrosternal pain and reported daily use of a combined OCP containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel. Upper endoscopy revealed a solitary, clean-based esophageal ulcer. Histopathologic evaluation excluded infectious causes, and she improved with proton pump inhibitor therapy and modification of pill consumption habits. This is the first reported case of OCP-induced esophagitis on the African continent and the fifth case overall, and it highlights the importance of awareness of this rare gastrointestinal adverse effect of a commonly used class of drugs, particularly in an area of the world that is promoting the increased uptake of female contraception as a tool for family planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford Medical Case ReportsSame topicPotassium and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207