MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409040453 · doi:10.36253/oar-3339

The Role of the Interviewer in the Cooperation Between Speakers and Researchers: The VAM («Voci dell’Adda e della Mera») Project

2025· article· en· W4409040453 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Martocchi, Vittorio Dell’Aquila, Fabio Scetti

Bibliographic record

VenueOral Archives Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicQualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterviewLinguisticsSociologyPhilosophyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper critically examines the «Voci dell’Adda e della Mera» (VAM) project, an initiative by the Istituto di Dialettologia e di Etnografia Valtellinese e Valchiavennasca (IDEVV) to establish the first oral archive of dialects in Sondrio province, Lombardy. The discussion centres on the methodological, practical, and legal challenges encountered in the production, documentation, and use or reuse of oral materials. In particular, this study explores the collaborative dynamics among researchers, volunteer interviewers, and speakers, which form the foundation of the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.213
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.122
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2130.122
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0240.035
Scholarly communication0.0150.009
Open science0.0030.025
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.530
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOral Archives JournalSame topicQualitative Research Methods and EthicsFrench-language works237,207