New insight on Mesoproterozoic paleogeography from the age and geochemistry of detrital minerals in the Belt Supergroup, USA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract During the Mesoproterozoic, western North America was connected to another continental mass of uncertain identity as part of the supercontinent Nuna. The ca. 1.4 Ga Belt Supergroup provides essential clues to the identity of this other continent, and here we present new detrital mineral age and geochemistry data for the Belt Supergroup to better understand its provenance and explore the implications for the configuration of Nuna. Detrital zircon age, trace element compositions, and Hf isotope compositions in the members of the Prichard Formation and formations of the Ravalli Group, together representing the lower portion of Belt stratigraphy, are remarkably uniform, with a main age peak at 1.61 Ga and juvenile Hf isotope compositions. Locally abundant detrital monazite in the Ravalli Group have age peaks at 1.67 Ga, 1.60 Ga, and 1.50 Ga. The Missoula Group and Lemhi subbasin units, representing the upper units of the Belt Supergroup, show a main zircon age population between 1.8 Ga and 1.7 Ga, with variable but generally juvenile Hf isotope compositions, and a minor population between 1.45 Ga and 1.40 Ga, also with juvenile Hf isotope compositions. Unusually high U content in zircon from the Garnet Range Formation of the Missoula Group may provide a new tool for correlation with the Lemhi subbasin. Both detrital monazite and rutile were recovered from several Missoula and Lemhi samples, with monazite recording metamorphic events at 2.43 Ga, 1.78 Ga, 1.73 Ga, and 1.68 Ga and rutile interpreted to record slow cooling from conditions ranging from amphibolite to granulite facies. Results for the Prichard Formation and Ravalli Group are consistent with a modified Southwest U.S.–East Antarctic (SWEAT) Nuna model whereby the South Australia Craton is adjacent to the Belt basin, providing most Prichard and Ravalli detritus, while the North Australia Craton is linked to northwest Canada, and East Antarctica is linked to southwest Laurentia. Tasmania likely was positioned between the Belt basin and the South Australia Craton based on the similar detrital zircon age and Hf isotope compositions in the Rocky Cape Group, the presence of contemporaneous mafic magmatism in the lower parts of both sedimentary sequences, and comparably aged post-depositional metamorphic mineral growth, and this connection likely persisted until at least 1.1 Ga. Results for the Missoula Group and Lemhi strata are consistent with sediment derived from the Mojave and Yavapai terranes in the southwest United States, with very limited local input from the Wyoming province.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".