MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409057382 · doi:10.30699/mmlj17.7.1.12

Detection of Metallo-beta-lactamase Producers Among Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales in a Tertiary Care Centre, Nepal

2024· article· en· W4409057382 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bijaya K. Dhakal, Shristi Raut, Hari Prasad Kattel, Marichman Bhul, Naresh Bahadur Khadka, Sangita Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Medical Laboratory Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTertiary careBeta-lactamaseBETA (programming language)MicrobiologyMedicineBiologyInternal medicineEscherichia coliComputer scienceGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objective: Increased reports of metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)producing isolates of Enterobacterales indicate that there are limited therapeutic options available for the treatment of infections caused by these organisms.To the best of our knowledge, there have been only a limited number of studies on MBLproducing Enterobacterales in Nepal.Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the current distribution of MBL-producing isolates in our setting.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted over a period of six months (from August 2023 to January 2024) at the Department of Microbiology, TU Teaching Hospital, Nepal.A total of 243 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales from various clinical specimens were subjected to the Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method (mCIM) and the EDTA-Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method (eCIM) for the detection of MBL-producing isolates, according to the standard methodology outlined by the latest Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.Result: A total of 111 (45.70%) isolates were identified as potential carbapenemase producers, based on their resistance or intermediate susceptibility to carbapenems (Meropenem and/or Imipenem) and/or resistance to cephalosporin subclass III (Ceftazidime).Among the total isolates of Enterobacterales, 52 (21.40%) were confirmed as carbapenemase producers by the mCIM method, 45 (18.50%) were confirmed as MBL producers by the eCIM method, while the remaining 7 (2.90%) were identified as serine-carbapenemase producers.Multidrug resistance (MDR) was observed in 151 (62.10%) of the total isolates, and all MBL-producing isolates were also MDR.Conclusion: This study found a higher percentage of MBL-producing Enterobacterales isolates, along with a high prevalence of multidrug resistance.Regular surveillance and stringent infection control policies are essential to minimize the spread of resistant strains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueModern Medical Laboratory JournalSame topicVibrio bacteria research studiesFrench-language works237,207