Biomass-Derived Syngas Chemical Looping Combustion Using Fluidizable Oxygen Carriers: A Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This critical review evaluates chemical looping combustion using a syngas derived from gasified biomass (BMD Syngas). It is anticipated that establishing such a process will open new opportunities for CO2 sequestration and the use of highly concentrated CO2 in the manufacturing and synthesis of fuels from entirely renewable feedstocks. This review focuses on the process conducted through using two interconnected fluidized bed units: a nickel oxide reduction unit (an endothermic Fuel Reactor) and a nickel oxidation unit (an exothermic Air Reactor). In this respect, a high-performance OC (HPOC) with Ni on a γ-Al2O3 fluidizable support (20wt% Ni, 1wt% Co, 5wt% La/γ-Al2O3) was developed at the CREC (Chemical Reactor Engineering Centre) of the University of Western Ontario, Canada. The HPOC was studied in a CREC Riser Simulator. The benefits of this mini-fluidized unit are that it can be operated at 2–40 s reaction times, 550–650 °C temperatures, 1.3–2.5 H2/CO ratios, and 0.5–1 biomass/syngas stoichiometric ratios, mimicking the conditions of industrial-scale CLC units. When using a syngas derived from biomass and the HPOC under these operating conditions, 90% CO, 92% H2, and 88% CH4 conversions, together with a 91% CO2 yield, were obtained. These results allowed the prediction of a 1.84–3.0 wt% (gO2 /gOC) oxygen transport capacity, with a 40–70% nickel oxide conversion. The experimental data acquired with the CREC Riser Simulator permitted the development of realistic kinetic models. The resulting kinetics were used in combination with Computational Particle Fluid Dynamics (CPFD) to demonstrate the operability of a large-scale industrial syngas CLC process in a downer fuel unit. In addition, these CPFD simulations were employed to corroborate that high CO2 yields are achievable in 12–15 m length downer fuel units.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".