MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409064317 · doi:10.1016/j.nexres.2025.100301

Techno-economic feasibility assessment of parabolic trough solar collector in concentrated solar power plants using various heat transfer fluids

2025· article· en· W4409064317 on OpenAlex
Collins Chike Kwasi-Effah, Ogheneochuko Okpako, Chinedu Precious Okoh, Osesumen Okojie Micheal, Kelvin Okoro-Obaraye

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNext research. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersTertiary Education Trust FundFonds National de la Recherche LuxembourgUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsParabolic troughHeat transfer fluidHeat transferConcentrated solar powerSolar powerEnvironmental sciencePhotovoltaic thermal hybrid solar collectorSolar energyMaterials sciencePower (physics)Process engineeringNuclear engineeringEngineeringMechanicsThermodynamicsElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The selection of appropriate Heat Transfer Fluids (HTFs) for Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants is critical for optimizing performance, economic viability, and environmental sustainability. This study systematically assesses the technical, economic, and environmental feasibility of CSP plants using various HTFs in Benin City, Nigeria, through simulations conducted with the System Advisor Model (SAM). We compare the performance, financial, and environmental metrics of 30 MW and 60 MW CSP plants utilizing seven HTFs, including HITEC Solar Salt, HITEC XL, Therminol 59, Therminol 66, Pressurized Water, CALORIA HT 43, and Therminol VP-1. For the 30 MW plant, HITEC Solar Salt delivered the highest annual energy output of 103,957,136 kWh-e and a capacity factor of 44.0 %, despite having a higher Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of $0.11/kWh. Conversely, Pressurized Water exhibited the lowest LCOE at $0.108/kWh, indicating a trade-off between cost and performance. Notably, HITEC Solar Salt demonstrated superior economic performance in key metrics, achieving the highest Net Present Value ($17,907,220) and Internal Rate of Return (7.64 %). In contrast, the 60 MW plant simulations revealed CALORIA HT 43 as the most favorable HTF, yielding the best annual AC energy output of 130,105,432 kWh-e and the lowest LCOE of $0.10/kWh, although it necessitated additional energy for freeze protection. Environmental impact analysis revealed that CSP plants using these HTFs emit significantly less CO₂ compared to fossil fuel-based plants, with annual emissions ranging from 1887 to 2602 tons for 30 MW and 60 MW plants, respectively. These findings suggest that while a 30 MW CSP plant may be suitable for HTFs like HITEC Solar Salt and Therminol fluids, larger capacity CSP plants (60 MW) are better suited for Benin City's meteorological conditions, with CALORIA HT 43 standing out in terms of performance, economic, and environmental metrics. This research contributes to the understanding of HTF selection in CSP systems, providing insights for optimizing renewable energy solutions in Nigeria and similar climates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it