MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409064375 · doi:10.20344/amp.22442

Serviços de Renovação da Terapêutica Crónica e Comparação com o Contexto Português

2025· review· pt· W4409064375 on OpenAlex
Margarida Castel‐Branco, Hélder Mota‐Filipe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Médica Portuguesa · 2025
Typereview
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesMedical prescriptionPhilosophyMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past few years, there has been a growing effort to integrate community pharmacists into managing chronic patients with chronic disease, to alleviate the pressure on healthcare systems. Pharmacists are not only experts in medicines but also have clinical skills to promote adherence to therapy and ensure monitoring of the health status of patients with chronic disease, especially in the period between medical appointments. Chronic disease medication renewal in community pharmacies is a pharmacy service that seeks to streamline patients' access to their medication while still receiving adequate healthcare. We conducted a review of the legislation in force in different countries regarding the chronic medication renewal service and compared it with Portuguese legislation, proposing a pharmacy intervention protocol that optimizes the provision of the service. Repeat Dispensing in the United Kingdom is the service that most resembles its counterpart in Portugal: both require a 12-month medical prescription, allow access to the prescribing history (without access to clinical information). In neither of them is notification of the prescriber mandatory, both require informed consent and lead to the creation of written records of the process. Canada's Adapt a Prescription is more comprehensive because it allows prescriptions valid for 24 months, enables access to clinical information, and requires notification of the prescriber within 24 hours. Ireland's Prescription Extension is more limited in that it does not allow for therapeutic substitution, nor does it enable access to prescribing history or clinical information, requiring notification of the prescriber within seven days. In turn, Australia's Continued Dispensing and the United States' Emergency Refills differ significantly in that they do not require a long-term medical prescription, namely in situations when it is not possible to obtain a valid prescription and refusal to dispense the medicine could be life-threatening to the patient. The Chronic Medication Renewal service in Portugal arises as a response to the needs of the healthcare system and has potential in the healthcare provided to the population, specifically in the therapeutic management of patients with chronic disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.294
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it