Evidence for a RIPK1-independent survival mechanism for CASPASE-8 in αβ T cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract CASPASE8 promotes both cell death and survival by acting as a trigger of apoptosis but also a repressor of necroptosis. In T cells, CASPASE8 is required for FAS induced apoptosis, but protects activated T cells from necroptosis. The broader role and mechanisms of CASPASE8 in the wider T cell compartment is less certain. Here, we analysed mice in which Casp8 was conditionally deleted in the lymphoid compartment by huCD2iCre. In the thymus, we found evidence of a modest impairment of early thymic progenitors and a striking absence of NKT cell development. Amongst mature peripheral T cells, there was a substantial and specific reduction in the CD8 T cell compartment, that included naive, central memory and virtual memory subsets. While life spans and turnover of CD8 T cells appeared largely normal, we did identify an acute requirement for continued CASPASE8 expression for survival of a fraction of CD8 T cells, since induced Casp8 deletion by tamoxifen induced CD8 CreERT resulted in an acute loss of CD8 T cells. CASPASE8 deficient T cells were resistant to FAS or TNF induced cell death in vitro. Generating Casp8 deficient mice that express a kinase dead RIPK1 confirmed that necroptosis contributed to death of thymic progenitors and some peripheral CD8 T cell subsets in the absence of CASPASE8. However, kinase dead RIPK1 failed to restore NKT cell development and only partially rescued CD8 VM T cells, while analysing mixed bone marrow chimeras suggested that CASPASE8 deficient CD4 and CD8 T cells were less competitively fit than WT T cells, even in the absence of RIPK1 kinase activity. These latter observations suggest the existence of a novel mechanism by which CASPASE8 promotes T cell survival that is independent of its established role in repressing necroptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".