MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409075371 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2025.03.027

Adult Height, Cardiovascular Disease, and the Underlying Mechanism: A Comprehensive Epidemiological and Genetic Analysis

2025· article· en· W4409075371 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jinyu Xiao, Jiayuan Li, Xueyao Wu, Hao Yu, Xunying Zhao, Wenqiang Zhang, Bin Xu, Tianpei Ma, Li Zhang, Rong Xiang, Huijie Cui, Peijing Yan, Mingshuang Tang, Yutong Wang, Yang Qu, Lin Chen, Yunjie Liu, Yanqiu Zou, Ling Zhang, Zhenmi Liu, Yuqin Yao, Chunxia Yang, Ben Zhang, Xia Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRecruitment Program for Young ProfessionalsScience Fund for Creative Research Groups
KeywordsMedicineMechanism (biology)EpidemiologyDiseaseGenetic epidemiologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Adult height measures the complete growth of an individual and influences the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Despite recent within-sibling studies that have suggested minimal effects from environmental confounders, biological mechanisms underlying the height-CVD relationship remain elusive. METHODS: Leveraging the large-scale UK Biobank data set and summary statistics from the latest genome-wide association studies, we reevaluated the effect of height on 8 major CVD subtypes. Phenotypic associations were determined using Cox proportional hazard analysis. Putative causal relationships were assessed using univariable Mendelian randomization. Mediation analysis and 2-step Mendelian randomization were further performed to investigate the mediation effect of 15 common cardiometabolic or pulmonary risk factors. RESULTS: Height was consistently associated with a decreased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), confirmed in epidemiological (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.91) and genetic (odds ratio, 0.89, 95% CI, 0.86-0.92) analysis. Forced vital capacity was identified as the most significant mediator for the height-CAD relationship in epidemiological (proportion-mediated, 65.6%; 95% CI, 53.1%-78.0%) and genetic (proportion-mediated, 46.2%; 95% CI, 5.0%-87.5%) analysis. Notably, obesity, and blood pressure, lipid, and C-reactive protein levels also exhibited significant mediatory effects. Despite a consistent risk effect of height on atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism, no promising mediator was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the health effects of height on CAD, atrial fibrillation, and venous thromboembolism and emphasizes forced vital capacity as the primary pathway that links height to CAD. Importantly, it indicates that the CAD risk associated with nonmodifiable height could be mitigated through enhanced lung function and cardiometabolic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Cardiology→Same topicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→