MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409076221 · doi:10.3389/feart.2025.1517081

Multidecadal estimation of hydrological contribution and glacier mass balance in the semi-arid Andes based on physically based modeling and geodetic mass balance

2025· article· en· W4409076221 on OpenAlexaff
Alonso Mejías, James McPhee, Hazem Mahmoud, David Farías-Barahona, Christophe Kinnard, Shelley MacDonell, Santiago Montserrat, Marcelo Somos‐Valenzuela, Alfonso Fernández

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Earth Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersAgencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
KeywordsGeodetic datumGlacier mass balanceGlacierBalance (ability)GeologyWater balanceAridHydrology (agriculture)GeomorphologyClimatologyPhysical geographyGeodesyGeographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glaciers are of paramount importance in diverse environments, and due to the accelerated retreat experienced in recent decades, efforts have intensified to achieve a comprehensive understanding of key variables such as mass balance and glacial melting. However, the scarcity of data in regions that are difficult to access, such as the Andes Cordillera, hinders reliable glaciological studies of the historical period. This study examined the mass balance and melting dynamics of the Universidad Glacier, the largest in the semi-arid Andes, from 1955 to 2020, using the physically based Cold Regions Hydrological Model (CRHM). The model was calibrated with geodetic mass balance estimates available between 1955 and 2020 and evaluated against on-site observations available between 2012 and 2014. Change point analysis revealed three contrasting periods of mass balance evolution: significant mass loss for the periods 1955–1971 and 2006–2020 and near-equilibrium mass balance from 1971 to 2006. These loss and gain periods align with the negative phases of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and the positive ENSO (El Niño) events, respectively. Simulated runoff from glacier melt showed a positive trend of 8% per decade since 1971. Calibrated and uncalibrated versions of the model showed similar temporal variability, but cumulative mass balance differed significantly. The model calibrated from 1955 to 2020 had a minimal overestimation of 0.1% in mass loss and slightly improved the representation of the annual albedo. Relative to this best-performing model, the model calibrated with geodetic mass balance estimates from 2000 to 2020 overestimated mass loss by 25%, whereas the uncalibrated model overestimated mass balance by 62%. Physically based modeling with parameters adjusted based on field observations is adequate to reproduce the most salient features of MB interannual variability. However, long-term projections may diverge significantly, and albedo parameterizations, including its spatial and temporal evolution throughout a glacier surface, are an avenue for future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Earth ScienceSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207