MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modeling of AlInAsSb waveguide avalanche photodiodes for MWIR applications

2025· article· en· W4409082675 on OpenAlexaff
Yegao Xiao, Michel Lestrade, Zhi Qiang Li, Z. M. Simon Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Instrumentation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsCrosslight Software (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAvalanche photodiodePhotodiodeOptoelectronicsSingle-photon avalanche diodeMaterials scienceWaveguideOpticsPhysicsDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mid-wave infrared (MWIR) photodetectors are obtaining increased market demand in various application fields such as sensing, spectroscopy, medical diagnostics, and communication systems. The application scope is also being expanded due to the integration ability for these devices into the silicon platforms. Although the MWIR avalanche photodiodes (APDs) have been developed and reported by some laboratories, progresses are still needed on reducing the signal-to-noise ratio, enhancing the quantum efficiency and improving bandwidths etc. These goal-oriented tasks are very challenging especially due to the internal impact ionization mechanism, the structure and material complexity, and the routine design trade-off issues among all the device performances. Therefore, modeling of such MWIR APDs as well as the relevant software package are highly requested to save the development time and cost. In this work, two-dimensional modeling of MWIR AlInAsSb waveguide APD operating at 2 μm is presented. The edge-butt waveguide coupling is investigated based on the beam propagation method. The APD photon-electronic behavior are further simulated based on a drift-diffusion theory. The frequency response and bandwidth are also evaluated. Modeling results of I-V curves, multiplication gain, breakdown voltage, excess noise factor, -3 dB bandwidth and gain-bandwidth product are presented with some comparable to the experimental report from other researchers. The bandwidth results are analysed and discussed further with clues for possible improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of InstrumentationSame topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207