MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409084320 · doi:10.2340/actadv.v105.42596

Chronic Hand Eczema, Real World, and Patient Centricity: A Narrative Review

2025· review· en· W4409084320 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sonja Molin, Emma Guttman‐Yassky, Jacob P. Thyssen, Anthony Bewley

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Dermato Venereologica · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicContact Dermatitis and Allergies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJanssen PharmaceuticalsJanssen BiotechLEO PharmaBausch HealthScheme for Promotion of Academic and Research CollaborationRibon TherapeuticsBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyGaldermaIncyteSun PharmaRegeneron PharmaceuticalsTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesSanofiCelldex TherapeuticsAmgenPfizer
KeywordsMedicineHand eczemaPsychosocialQuality of life (healthcare)Socioeconomic statusDiseaseContext (archaeology)Health careChronic diseaseChronic conditionFamily medicineAllergyNursingPopulationEnvironmental healthImmunologyPathologyPsychiatryContact dermatitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic hand eczema is a multifactorial, fluctuating, inflammatory skin disease of the hands and wrists, defined as hand eczema that persists for at least 3 months or recurs at least twice within 1 year. Chronic hand eczema is heterogeneous in nature with different clinical manifestations. This chronic condition can significantly impact daily activities and health-related quality of life for patients, including notable physical, psychosocial, occupational, and socioeconomic burdens. However, awareness of the disease and the patient experience remains poor. This review aims to improve understanding of chronic hand eczema in the context of its underlying pathogenesis, clinical subtypes and presentation, and risk factors. Additionally, an overview of the patient experience of the disease, including health-related quality of life and socioeconomic implications, is provided. Improved understanding of chronic hand eczema will support optimal patient care by empowering healthcare providers to more quickly and correctly diagnose this disease with high unmet treatment needs and subsequently offer appropriate holistic care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Dermato VenereologicaSame topicContact Dermatitis and AllergiesFrench-language works237,207