Sediment eDNA metabarcoding reveals the endemism in benthic foraminifera from Arctic methane cold seepages
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Benthic foraminifera are one of the major groups of eukaryotes living at cold seeps on the Arctic seafloor. However, their distribution and endemicity in these habitats have been largely debated. It is still unclear whether foraminiferal species commonly found in cold seeps differ genetically from those in deep-sea environments, and to what extent the seep community is distinct. To address these questions, we analyzed sediment DNA metabarcoding data specifically targeting foraminifera in different deep-water cold seep microhabitats (microbial mats, siboglinid tubeworms field) and reference sites within and outside the seep. Our results revealed microhabitat specificity among benthic foraminifera species. Microbial mats were dominated by a unique type of rDNA sequences assigned to a new lineage of monothalamid (single-chambered) foraminifera not previously reported from any other Arctic location. Other foraminiferal species were found across both seeps and reference stations. This study shows the presence of an endemic benthic foraminiferal species at cold seeps and confirms the existence of many common opportunistic species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it