BONNET Louis, La communauté de vie conjugale au regard des lois de l'Église catholique. Les étapes d'une évolution du Code de 1917 au Concile Vatican II et au Code de 1983, postface de Gaston Candelier, Cerf, Paris, 2004, 532 p.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
C'est la contradiction de l'cole italienne de droit d'avoir voulu traiter techniquement le sacrement comme un acte ordinaire en droit tout en proclamant formellement ses particularits.Le sacrement ne peut tre assimil un acte juridique que si l'on prend en compte ses qualits propres (p.333).Le sacrement sera donc qualifi d'acte juridique mais l'auteur dmontrera qu'il est de nature sui generis (p.342).Nous le disions ds le dbut de cette recension, cette thse soutenue la Pontificia Universit Gregoriana prsente un trs grand intrt pour la doctrine canonique.Qu'on nous permette toutefois de faire une remarque propos de la note 8 du dbut du livre, laquelle nous a fait sursauter.L'auteur annonce que, dans son tude, les traductions franaises sont celles de la traduction officielle approuve par la Confrence des vques du Canada et qui est d'usage courant en France (nous soulignons) .Et de renvoyer la publication due
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".