Initial intraventricular involvement and early intracerebral hematoma retraction: The “ventricular washout”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Intraventricular hematoma (IVH) occurs in approximately 40% of acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients and is significantly associated with worse clinical outcomes. According to cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, some blood within the ventricles may circulate through the subarachnoid spaces, leading to its apparent “disappearance” on follow-up imaging. We aim to investigate the association between initial IVH involvement and significant early ICH retraction at follow-up imaging. Methods Data are from the MCAHP (Multiphase CT Angiography Hematoma Prediction) Study, which included consecutive patients with acute ICH investigated with multimodal CT imaging. Patients who underwent surgery before follow-up imaging were excluded. IVH severity was assessed using the IVH score. The primary outcome was significant early ICH retraction, defined as volume decrease (⩾3 ml or ⩾15%) between the initial and follow-up scans. Secondary outcomes included early absolute and relative ICH decrease. Associations between outcomes and initial IVH involvement or IVH score were assessed with logistic regression adjusted for age, baseline NIHSS, initial ICH volume, and onset-to-CT time. Results Overall, 177 ICH patients were included. The median age was 71 years (IQR = 59–80), 71 (40.1%) patients were female, and 64 (36.2%) presented with initial IVH involvement. Patients with initial IVH, compared to those without, had a larger initial ICH volume (28.5 ml [IQR = 12.7–52.5] vs. 18.9 ml [IQR = 8.1–30.6], p < 0.001) and different ICH location (deep = 54.7% vs 47.8%; lobar = 35.9% vs 46.0%; infratentorial = 7.3% vs 6.2%; p < 0.001). Early ICH retraction was observed in 33 (18.6%) patients: 21 (32.8%) with initial IVH and 10 (10.6%) without initial IVH. There was a significant association between early ICH retraction and initial IVH involvement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.02 [95% CI = 1.72–9.41]) and IVH score (aOR 1.14 [95% CI = 1.05–1.23] per 1-point increase). Similar results were observed for secondary outcomes. Conclusion Initial IVH involvement is associated with early ICH retraction – “intraventricular washout.” This might result in an underestimation of hematoma expansion occurrence and severity in these patients, with potential implications when evaluating the predictive performance of hematoma expansion markers/scores and the radiological efficacy of hemostatic treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Other design | low |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".