MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409089771 · doi:10.1177/23969873251330186

Initial intraventricular involvement and early intracerebral hematoma retraction: The “ventricular washout”

2025· article· en· W4409089771 on OpenAlex
Umberto Pensato, Chitapa Kaveeta, Kõji Tanaka, Johanna M. Ospel, Mohamed A AlShamrani, MacKenzie Horn, Dar Dowlatshahi, Girish Baburao Kulkarni, Ericka Teleg, Abdulaziz Sulaiman Al Sultan, Linda Kašičková, Tomoyuki Ohara, Piyush Ojha, Sina Marzoughi, Bijoy K. Menon, Mayank Goyal, Andrew M. Demchuk

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Stroke Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntraventricular hemorrhageIntracerebral hemorrhageHematomaSubarachnoid hemorrhageCerebrospinal fluidCardiologyLogistic regressionAnesthesiaInternal medicineRadiologyGestational age

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Intraventricular hematoma (IVH) occurs in approximately 40% of acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients and is significantly associated with worse clinical outcomes. According to cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, some blood within the ventricles may circulate through the subarachnoid spaces, leading to its apparent “disappearance” on follow-up imaging. We aim to investigate the association between initial IVH involvement and significant early ICH retraction at follow-up imaging. Methods Data are from the MCAHP (Multiphase CT Angiography Hematoma Prediction) Study, which included consecutive patients with acute ICH investigated with multimodal CT imaging. Patients who underwent surgery before follow-up imaging were excluded. IVH severity was assessed using the IVH score. The primary outcome was significant early ICH retraction, defined as volume decrease (⩾3 ml or ⩾15%) between the initial and follow-up scans. Secondary outcomes included early absolute and relative ICH decrease. Associations between outcomes and initial IVH involvement or IVH score were assessed with logistic regression adjusted for age, baseline NIHSS, initial ICH volume, and onset-to-CT time. Results Overall, 177 ICH patients were included. The median age was 71 years (IQR = 59–80), 71 (40.1%) patients were female, and 64 (36.2%) presented with initial IVH involvement. Patients with initial IVH, compared to those without, had a larger initial ICH volume (28.5 ml [IQR = 12.7–52.5] vs. 18.9 ml [IQR = 8.1–30.6], p < 0.001) and different ICH location (deep = 54.7% vs 47.8%; lobar = 35.9% vs 46.0%; infratentorial = 7.3% vs 6.2%; p < 0.001). Early ICH retraction was observed in 33 (18.6%) patients: 21 (32.8%) with initial IVH and 10 (10.6%) without initial IVH. There was a significant association between early ICH retraction and initial IVH involvement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.02 [95% CI = 1.72–9.41]) and IVH score (aOR 1.14 [95% CI = 1.05–1.23] per 1-point increase). Similar results were observed for secondary outcomes. Conclusion Initial IVH involvement is associated with early ICH retraction – “intraventricular washout.” This might result in an underestimation of hematoma expansion occurrence and severity in these patients, with potential implications when evaluating the predictive performance of hematoma expansion markers/scores and the radiological efficacy of hemostatic treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Other designlow
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it