A qPCR assay for the detection of Phytophthora abietivora, an emerging pathogen on fir species cultivated as Christmas trees
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emerging species of the Phytophthora genus are among the most important threats to global plant biodiversity, horticulture and trade. For instance, Phytophthora root rot (PRR) of Christmas trees, mainly Fraser (Abies fraseri) and balsam (Abies balsamea) firs, is responsible for an average of 10% of the observed diseased trees in plantations. Diagnosing PRR involves isolation followed by morphological and molecular identification of the causal agents. However, these methods are rarely adapted to larger scale monitoring such as in situ detection. For these applications, molecular detection of environmental DNA (eDNA) provides the fast and high-throughput results needed. Phytophthora abietivora was associated with PRR in firs (Abies spp.) cultivated as Christmas trees in the province of Québec (Canada). This study focused on developing a sensitive and specific qPCR assay targeting P. abietivora and validating its efficiency on DNA extracted from soil and roots. A set of primers and probe was designed for this assay, and parameters such as the limit of detection (LOD95%) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were measured. The assay was tested on DNA obtained from healthy-looking and PRR symptomatic Fraser and balsam firs. The assay was shown to be semi-specific because it cross-reacted with P. europaea and three other phylogenetically close species, but deemed specific in the context of PRR of firs. The LOD95% was estimated at 10 copies per reaction (Cq of 35.7) and the LOQ to 33 P. abietivora oospores per gram of soil. Out of 488 DNA samples from soil, 68 were positive for P. abietivora from which 42 (61.7%) were from PRR symptomatic trees. Only a slight overlap (3 out of 7 samples) was observed with previously obtained baiting results. This assay will be useful for rapid diagnostics of P. abietivora infected trees and as a prospecting tool to better characterize the natural distribution and dissemination of the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".