MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409107151 · doi:10.1101/2025.03.28.645960

Sub-zero temperatures during early spring migration in blue-spotted salamanders ( <i>Ambystoma laterale</i> )

2025· preprint· en· W4409107151 on OpenAlexaffabout
Danilo Giacometti, Patrick D. Moldowan, Glenn J. Tattersall

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoAlgonquin CollegeBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpring (device)BiologyGeographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Amphibians that reproduce in early spring at northern latitudes may encounter environmental ice while migrating to their breeding sites. Due to the nucleation properties of ice, contact with environmental ice may induce rapid freezing of body tissues, which can cause irreversible damage to cells and lead to death. Although some species of salamanders are known to move over ice during early spring migration, freeze-intolerant species are expected to avoid physical contact with ice crystals to minimise the risk of freezing. Here, we documented the thermal biology of the freeze-intolerant blue-spotted salamander ( Ambystoma laterale Hallowell, 1856) migrating at sub-zero temperatures in Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario, Canada. During our surveys, we found sheltered, inactive, and migrating individuals; some in direct contact with ice. Our field measurements of skin temperature using high resolution thermal imaging suggest that A. laterale can sustain activity in a supercooled state (i.e., chilled below the freezing point of body fluids but not frozen). By migrating in a supercooled state, these salamanders may overcome the risk of freezing while simultaneously prolonging their breeding season and potentially avoiding predators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→