Drivers of soil C quality and stability: Insights from a topsoil dataset at landscape scale in Ontario, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Although soil C is a critical component of soil health, studies robustly exploring the agronomic and pedoclimatic effects on soil C are limited, especially at the landscape scale. Therefore, a dataset of 1511 samples from agricultural fields across Ontario was used to evaluate the impacts of agronomic and pedoclimatic factors on eight soil C indicators including chemistry and thermal stability of soil C using the programmed pyrolysis approach. Soil C quality and stability were largely controlled by the inherent soil characteristics such as soil texture. Significant interactive effects of cropping system and tillage intensity on soil C indicators were observed; however, the number of significant effects varied among the three soil textural classes. All soil C indicators were significantly different among the cropping systems for the coarse textured soils, but the cropping system differences decreased under medium and fine textured soils. From the pyrolysis analysis, the hydrogen index (HI) and oxygen index (OI) also confirmed that the soil C chemistry was influenced by the cropping system. For instance, orchard systems had stable pools of soil C whereas vegetable systems were associated with less advanced degree of soil C decomposition. Remaining soil management variables (cover crop use, tillage intensity, and organic amendments) had less influence on soil C indicators in all soil textural classes. Principal component analysis revealed a close association of soil C indicators with the mean annual precipitation (MAP) and cropping system; suggesting that the quantity and quality of soil C inputs associated with different cropping systems and increase in precipitation had a large influence on soil C. Our results confirm the significant effects of agronomic and pedoclimatic variables on chemistry, thermal stability, and composition of soil C pools, which have long-term implications on soil C storage, mitigating global climate change, and improving soil health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".