Evaluation of the Tu’Washindi Na PrEP Intervention to Reduce Gender-Based Violence and Increase Preexposure Prophylaxis Uptake and Adherence Among Kenyan Adolescent Girls and Young Women: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescent girls and young women constitute a priority population disproportionately affected by HIV, accounting for 25% of annual HIV incidence among people older than 15 years in Kenya. Although oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective in reducing HIV acquisition, its protective benefit has been limited among adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa because of low uptake, adherence, and persistence. Intimate partner violence (IPV) and relationship power inequities are widespread among adolescent girls and young women and contribute to higher HIV incidence and lower PrEP use. Interventions are needed to support sustained PrEP use among adolescent girls and young women by addressing IPV and relationship dynamics. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test the effectiveness of Tu'Washindi na PrEP ("We are Winners with PrEP"), a multilevel community-based intervention, to increase uptake and adherence to PrEP and reduce IPV among adolescent girls and young women in Siaya County, Kenya. METHODS: The Tu'Washindi na PrEP intervention was co-designed by our team and adolescent girls and young women using participatory methods and includes 3 components delivered over 6 months: an 8-session, empowerment-based support club for adolescent girls and young women, community sensitization targeted toward male partners, and PrEP education events for couples. The intervention will be evaluated using a cluster randomized controlled trial across 22 administrative wards in Siaya County, Kenya, enrolling 72 adolescent girls and young women per ward (total N=1584). The primary objectives are to test the effectiveness of the intervention on PrEP uptake and adherence immediately after delivery (month 6 after enrollment) and 6 months later (month 12). As secondary objectives, we will test the intervention effect on IPV. A rigorous process evaluation will explore mechanisms of change, contextual factors, and implementation considerations to inform future refinement and scale-up, using programmatic data, participant questionnaires, and qualitative interviews with participants and intervention providers. RESULTS: Data collection started in September 2022. As of December 2024, enrollment has been completed in 16 of the 22 study wards, with 72.6% (1150/1584) of participants enrolled. We anticipate that data collection will be completed in May 2026 and results will be available by mid-2027. CONCLUSIONS: The study builds directly on our promising formative and pilot research to develop the evidence base for this youth-designed, multilevel HIV prevention intervention. If effective, Tu'Washindi will be ideally positioned for sustainable integration into existing youth-focused programming to expand and support PrEP use in this priority population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05599581; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05599581. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/55931.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".