MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409130191 · doi:10.1101/2025.03.28.646015

Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Neuroprotection: Impact of Voluntary versus Enforced Exercise in Alzheimer’s Disease Models

2025· preprint· en· W4409130191 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra Badea, Ali Mahzarnia, Divya Reddy, Zijian Dong, Robert J. Anderson, Hae Sol Moon, Jacques Stout, Emmanuel Barbier, Christina L. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroprotectionNeuroimagingNeuroscienceMedicineAlzheimer's diseaseDiseasePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exercise is a promising strategy for preventing or delaying Alzheimer's disease (AD), yet its mechanisms remain unclear. We investigated how exercise influences brain structure, function, and behavior in a familial AD model. Mice underwent voluntary, voluntary plus enforced exercise, or remained sedentary. Neuroimaging included in vivo manganese-enhanced MRI (MEMRI). perfusion, and ex vivo diffusion MRI to assess morphometry, activity, cerebral blood flow (CBF), microstructural integrity and connectivity. Both exercise regimens induced structural and functional brain adaptations while reducing anhedonia. Voluntary exercise increased cortical and limbic volumes, particularly in the hippocampus, cingulate, and entorhinal cortex, supporting cognitive and emotional regulation. Adding enforced exercise influenced subcortical and sensory regions, including visual, motor and associative areas, supporting sensory-motor integration. MEMRI revealed increased activity in sensorimotor, limbic, and associative cortices, with voluntary exercise enhancing limbic and associative regions, and enforced exercise strengthening sensorimotor and subcortical circuits. White matter integrity improved in memory-associate pathways such as the corpus callosum, cingulum, and hippocampal commissure. Synaptic remodeling was observed in the cingulate cortex, anterior thalamic nuclei, and amygdala. Voluntary exercise enhanced CBF in the motor cortex and hippocampus, while enforced exercise limited these increases. Connectivity analyses revealed exercise-responsive networks spanning the cingulate cortex, entorhinal cortex, anterior thalamic nuclei, and basolateral amygdala, and associated tracts. Graph analyses linked running distance with increased thalamic, brainstem, and cerebellar connectivity, associating exercise intensity with plasticity. These findings highlight the ability of chronic exercise to modulate neuroimaging biomarkers through distinct but complementary pathways, reinforcing its potential as a neuroprotective intervention for AD. Highlights: Exercise alters MRI biomarkers via distinct and partially overlapping mechanisms.Voluntary exercise boosts cortical and limbic regions for emotion and cognition.Enforced exercise strengthens subcortical and sensory areas for motor control.FA increases suggest memory tract reinforcement and grey matter remodelling.Graph analysis reveals plasticity in memory, emotion, and reward circuits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→