Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractThe 2019 Northwest Territories General Election, held on October 1, represented a decisive juncture in territorial politics, reaffirming recently developed trends and potentially introducing new ones. The election provided a window of opportunity for significant change in the face of territorial politics, with a handful of long-term cabinet ministers opting to retire following the 18th Assembly. The election reaffirmed the trend of declining incumbency first seen in the 2015 election, with several incumbents losing their re-election bids, often in landslide defeats. The 2019 election also saw a breakthrough in the representation of women in the Legislative Assembly.. Lastly, in 2019 the territory became the first province or territory in Canada to introduce online voting in general elections. RésuméL'Élection Générale Territoriale qui s'est tenue le 1er octobre 2019 dans les Territoires du Nord-Ouest a constitué un tournant décisif dans la politique territoriale en confirmant, d’une part, les tendances récemment enregistrées et, d’une autre part, en introduisant potentiellement de nouvelles donnes. Cette élection a changé d’une façon très significative le paysage de la politique territoriale puisqu’une poignée de ministres bien installés depuis fort longtemps avaient choisi de prendre leur retraite après la 18ème Assemblée. En effet, cette élection a confirmé la tendance à la baisse du nombre de députés réélus pour un nouveau mandat que l’on a observée une première fois lors de l'élection de 2015 lorsque plusieurs députés sortants ont perdu leurs sièges, le plus souvent en se faisant battre à plate couture. L'élection de 2019 a également vu une percée dans la représentativité des femmes au sein de l'Assemblée législative. Pour terminer, il convient de souligner que le territoire est devenu en 2019 la première province ou territoire du Canada à introduire le vote en ligne aux élections générales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".