MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409145261 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.124.048650

Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Surgery for Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the AHA Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry

2025· article· en· W4409145261 on OpenAlexaff
Santosh B. Murthy, Cenai Zhang, Andrew Garton, Brian Mac Grory, Shreyansh Shah, Gregg C. Fonarow, Lee H. Schwamm, Deepak L. Bhatt, Eric E. Smith, Guido J. Falcone, Seyedmehdi Payabvash, Wendy Ziai, Jared Knopman, Charles Matouk, J Mocco, Hooman Kamel, Kevin N. Sheth

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsMedicineIntracerebral hemorrhagePropensity score matchingModified Rankin ScaleCraniotomySurgeryStroke (engine)Odds ratioLogistic regressionRetrospective cohort studyCohortAmbulatoryInternal medicineIschemic strokeSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in improving outcomes after nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains uncertain, with inconsistent findings from randomized clinical trials. Our objective was to evaluate the real-world impact of MIS on ICH outcomes using a nationally representative cohort. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with a nontraumatic ICH enrolled in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021. We excluded patients with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke or other intracranial hemorrhage subtypes, those who underwent open craniotomy or craniectomy, and patients transferred to another hospital. The exposure was MIS, defined as a composite of stereotactic surgical evacuation and endoscopic surgical evacuation. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included functional outcomes at discharge (discharge disposition, ambulatory status, and modified Rankin Scale score). We matched patients who underwent MIS with nonsurgical patients using overlap propensity matching and used multiple logistic regression to study the association between MIS and outcomes. RESULTS: Among 684 467 patients with ICH, 555 964 were included; the mean age was 68 (SD, 15.3) years, and 262 999 (47.3%) were female. MIS was performed in 703 patients of whom 312 had stereotactic surgery and 391 had endoscopic surgery. In the matched cohort, in-hospital deaths occurred in 60 of 446 (13.5%) with MIS and 8321 of 35 361 patients (23.5%) without surgery. In regression analyses, MIS was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.39-0.65]) and favorable discharge disposition (adjusted odds ratio, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.61-2.32]) but not with ambulatory status or functional outcomes. In additional analyses, stereotactic surgery and endoscopic surgery were independently associated with lower mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In a large diverse cohort of patients with ICH, MIS was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and favorable discharge disposition. These findings support efforts to understand the durable impact of MIS in patients with ICH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207