MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409147113 · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125060

Climate change mitigation through irrigation strategies during rice growing season is off-set in fallow season

2025· article· en· W4409147113 on OpenAlexaff
Sebastián Echeverría-Progulakis, Néstor Pérez‐Méndez, Marc Viñas, Mar Carreras-Sempere, Míriam Guivernau, Lluís Jornet, Mar Català-Forner, Maite Martínez‐Eixarch

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
FundersMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadGeneralitat de CatalunyaMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsIrrigationGrowing seasonClimate changeEnvironmental scienceAgronomyDry seasonAgroforestryWater resource managementEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-continuous flooding irrigation practices, such as alternate wetting and drying (AWD) and mid-season drainage (MSD), have been implemented in rice agroecosystems to reduce water use and mitigate climate change. Draining fields reduces methane (CH 4 ) emissions, as soil aeration decreases the abundance and activity of soil methanogens. Mitigation effects during the growing season have been widely studied. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding potential effects these growing season practices might have on subsequent fallow season emissions. This is relevant when assessing overall annual CH 4 emissions, particularly in systems in which fallow seasons account for a significant part of these. A field experiment was implemented in the Ebro Delta region (Catalonia, Spain) with the objective of identifying potential effects of growing season AWD and MSD on CH 4 emitted during the following flooded fallow season, in comparison to continuously flooded fields. Both emissions and the structure of soil microbial communities were analyzed for rice field plots under the assessed irrigation strategies during the growing season and later for a continuously flooded mesocosm across the fallow season. Both practices achieved an average 86% decrease in CH 4 fluxes when compared to continuous flooding during the growing season. AWD resulted in the highest fallow season emissions, leading to increases in overall annual cumulative CH 4 emissions ( + 8%), global warming potential ( + 30%) and yield-scaled global warming potential ( + 70%) compared to continuous flooding. Growing season AWD decreased the relative abundance of both methanogens and methanotrophs in the fallow season. Reduced methanotroph communities might lead to lower CH 4 consumption, resulting in higher fallow season emissions and offsetting the mitigation effect achieved during the growing season. Under the studied conditions, MSD represented a more effective mitigation strategy. These results highlight the importance of considering both rice growing and fallow season when assessing climate change mitigation strategies. • AWD climate change mitigation effect is off-set in flooded fallow seasons. • MSD can be a more effective mitigation strategy, depending on system conditions. • AWD can decrease yields, increasing its annual yield scaled global warming potential. • Irrigation strategies result in legacy effect on soil microbial communities. • Assessments of rice management must consider both growing and fallow seasons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental ManagementSame topicRice Cultivation and Yield ImprovementFrench-language works237,207