Awareness and willingness regarding organ donation among people with HIV in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Given the current organ shortage crisis, organ transplantation among people with HIV (PWH) has become a reality. To effectively implement this practice, understanding the attitudes and beliefs about organ donation among PWH in Canada is imperative. PWH receiving care at the McGill University Health Centre were recruited to participate in a survey between October 2023-June 2024. The questionnaire assessed knowledge of organ donation and willingness to donate or receive organs from donors with HIV. Descriptive statistics were performed. Of 100 participants, 33.0% knew that PWH can undergo organ transplantation in Canada, and 26.0% knew that PWH in Canada can donate their organs to PWH. Additionally, 74.5% would consider accepting an organ from a deceased donor with HIV, 78.0% would consider accepting an organ from a living donor regardless of HIV status, 78.0% would be willing to be deceased donors, and 44.0% would be willing to be a living organ donor. Female-identifying and African, Caribbean or Black participants showed higher awareness about organ donation, whereas male-identifying and White participants demonstrated higher willingness to donate and receive organs from donors with HIV. While willingness among PWH was high, knowledge of organ transplantation was suboptimal, highlighting the need for increased awareness efforts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".