MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409151962 · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2025)031

The Nahm transform of multi-fractional instantons

2025· article· en· W4409151962 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed M. Anber, Erich Poppitz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of High Energy Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsInstantonMathematical physicsTheoretical physicsQuantum electrodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bstract We embed the multi-fractional instantons of SU( N ) gauge theories on $$ {\mathbbm{T}}^4 $$ T 4 with ’t Hooft twisted boundary conditions into U( N ) bundles and use the Nahm transform to study the corresponding configurations on the dual $$ {\hat{\mathbbm{T}}}^4 $$ T ̂ 4 . We first show that SU( N ) fractional instantons of topological charge $$ Q=\frac{r}{N},r\in \left\{1,2,\dots, N-1\right\} $$ Q = r N , r ∈ 1 2 … N − 1 , are mapped to fractional instantons of SU( $$ \hat{N} $$ N ̂ ) of charge $$ \hat{Q}=\frac{r}{\hat{N}} $$ Q ̂ = r N ̂ , where $$ \hat{N} $$ N ̂ = Nq 1 q 3 − rq 3 + q 1 and q 1 , 3 are integer-quantized U(1) fluxes. We then explicitly construct the Nahm transform of constant field strength fractional instantons of SU( N ) and find the SU( $$ \hat{N} $$ N ̂ ) configurations they map to. Both the $$ {\mathbbm{T}}^4 $$ T 4 instantons and their $$ {\hat{\mathbbm{T}}}^4 $$ T ̂ 4 images are self-dual for appropriately tuned torus periods. The Nahm duality can be extended to tori with detuned periods, with detuning parameter ∆, mapping solutions with ∆ > 0 on $$ {\mathbbm{T}}^4 $$ T 4 to ones with $$ \hat{\Delta } $$ ∆ ̂ < 0 on $$ {\hat{\mathbbm{T}}}^4 $$ T ̂ 4 . We also recall that f

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of High Energy PhysicsSame topicMathematical functions and polynomialsFrench-language works237,207