Exploring the Potential of Voxel-Mirrored Homotopic Connectivity (VMHC) and Regional Homogeneity (ReHo) in Understanding Cognitive Changes After Heart Transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the application value of voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity (VMHC) and regional homogeneity (ReHo) in evaluating cognitive impairment after heart transplantation. Methods: A total of 68 heart transplant patients and 56 healthy controls were included. ReHo and VMHC were calculated using DPARSF software. A two-sample t-test was applied to compare the differences in ReHo and VMHC between the two groups, and a Pearson correlation analysis was performed by extracting the VMHC and ReHo values of different brain regions and correlating them with cognitive scale scores of the patient groups. Results: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores were lower in the heart transplant group than in the control group (MMSE: t = 4.028, p < 0.001; MoCA: t = 4.914, p < 0.001). Compared with the control group, the ReHo values of Frontal_Sup_R (t = −4.422, p < 0.001), Thalamus_L (t = −3.911, p < 0.001), and Calcarine_L (t = −3.640, p < 0.001) were lower in the heart transplantation group, while the ReHo of Temporal_Sup_L was higher (t = 4.609, p < 0.001). VMHC was elevated for bilateral Cerebellum_Crus1 (t = 3.803, p < 0.001) and decreased for bilateral calcarine (t = −3.424, p < 0.001). The ReHo of Frontal_Sup_R was positively correlated with MMSE (r = 0.345, p = 0.004) and MoCA (r = 0.376, p = 0.002). The ReHo of Temporal_Sup_L was also positively correlated with MMSE (r = 0.397, p < 0.001) and MoCA (r = 0.542, p < 0.001). The VMHC of bilateral calcarine showed a positive correlation with MMSE (r = 0.513, p < 0.001) and MoCA (r = 0.398, p < 0.001). Other differential brain regions showed no significant correlation with the MMSE and MoCA scale scores. Conclusions: Cognitive decline was observed in heart transplant patients. Heart transplant patients exhibited altered ReHo and VMHC in several brain regions compared with healthy controls. These changes may underlie impaired cognitive function in heart transplant patients. These findings may contribute to understanding the neural mechanisms of cognitive changes in heart transplant patients and could inform future research on potential intervention strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".