MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409157519 · doi:10.1142/s0218271825500348

Implications of the Milky Way declining rotation curve

2025· article· en· W4409157519 on OpenAlexaff
J. W. Moffat, H. Sharron, Viktor T. Toth

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics D · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMilky WayGalaxy rotation curveRotation (mathematics)AstronomyAstrophysicsTheoretical physicsGalaxyGeometryGalaxy formation and evolution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Almost all spiral galaxies have been observed to have flattening rotation curves. The new Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) shows a Milky Way with a sharply Keplerian declining rotation curve, starting at [Formula: see text]16[Formula: see text]kpc and ending at 26.5[Formula: see text]kpc. The data reduce the total Milky Way mass by an order of magnitude, [Formula: see text], compared to the standard required dark matter halo mass, [Formula: see text]. Newtonian and MOdified Gravity (MOG) fits are applied to the Gaia DR3 rotation curve data. The fit obtained using MOG has a total mass of [Formula: see text], while the Newtonian fit predicts a mass of [Formula: see text]. These are in excess of the estimated visible baryon mass of the Milky Way, [Formula: see text]. It is possible that if the mass of the circumgalactic medium (CGM) plasma-gas continues to be confirmed experimentally, then the additional baryon mass required to account for the estimated total Milky Way mass could be attributed to the CGM hot plasma-gas halo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics DSame topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207