MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409158379 · doi:10.63315/jrcd.v20i1.2599

Co-designing a Community Housing Strategy: Insights from a Rural District

2025· article· en· W4409158379 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nick Taylor, Michael Mackay, Harvey C. Perkins, Kayla Stewart, Helen Algar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of rural and community development · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRural housingEconomicsBusinessPolitical scienceRural area

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interpreting issues associated with the supply of suitable, affordable, socially inclusive housing in rural areas requires analysis through a different lens to that of urban housing. This paper reports a case study of the development of a community housing strategy in a rural district in Aotearoa New Zealand. A co-production of knowledge approach was used to support a community agency to define and address an array of local housing issues and develop a strategy to improve housing outcomes. We interpret the process undertaken to develop the housing strategy and conclude with a discussion of the relevance of a co-construction of knowledge approach. We also reflect on the importance of strong local leadership and commitment of resources to building local capacity and capability in rural regeneration planning. Keywords: Rural regeneration, rural housing, community strategy, co-construction of knowledge, New Zealand __________________________________________________________________________ Co-conception d'une stratégie de logement communautaire : observations d'un district rural L'interprétation des enjeux liés à l'offre de logements adaptés, abordables et socialement inclusifs en zones rurales nécessite une analyse différente de celle du logement urbain. Cet article présente une étude de cas sur l'élaboration d'une stratégie de logement communautaire dans un district rural d'Aotearoa, en Nouvelle-Zélande. Une approche de coproduction de connaissances a été utilisée pour aider un organisme communautaire à définir et à traiter un ensemble de problèmes locaux en matière de logement et à élaborer une stratégie visant à améliorer les résultats relatifs au logement. Nous interprétons le processus d'élaboration de la stratégie de logement et concluons par une discussion sur la pertinence d'une approche de co-construction de connaissances. Nous réfléchissons également à l'importance d'un leadership local fort et de l'engagement de ressources pour renforcer les capacités locales en matière de planification de la régénération rurale. Mots-clés : régénération rurale, logement rural, stratégie communautaire, co-construction de connaissances, Nouvelle-Zélande

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of rural and community developmentSame topicInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207