MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409167790 · doi:10.1063/5.0257906

Magneto-optical tuning of ferromagnetic resonance in silicon-doped yttrium iron garnet

2025· article· en· W4409167790 on OpenAlexafffund
M. A. Popov, Hryhorii Chumak, O. Klimov, Yurii Shepelytskyi, J Radó, Alla Reznik, Mitchell S. Albert, Michael R. Page, G. Srinivasan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagneto-Optical Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsNOSM UniversityLakehead UniversityThunder Bay Regional Research Institute
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchMaterials and Manufacturing DirectorateNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDopingMaterials scienceYttrium iron garnetSiliconFerromagnetismYttriumMagnetoFerromagnetic resonanceMagneto opticalCondensed matter physicsResonance (particle physics)OptoelectronicsMetallurgyMagnetMagnetic fieldMagnetizationPhysicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report is on experiments and theory on the process of optically stimulated electron population density redistribution in Si-substituted yttrium-iron garnet single crystals at 77 K. It was determined that a photo-induced uniaxial anisotropy field arose in the YIG:Si sample in response to illumination by quasi-linearly polarized laser (λ = 808 nm) leading to redistribution of Fe2+ ions among the nonequivalent octahedral sites. The photo-induced field was measured by variation of ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) frequencies in the X-band. The measured FMR frequency shift demonstrated a pronounced dependence on the polarization vector orientation with respect to crystallographic axes, in accordance with the theory discussed here. The frequency shift dependence on light intensity (for optimal polarization orientation) was found to be nearly linear, at least within the output intensity range of the optical source. The maximum frequency shift was −130 MHz for 75 mW applied optical power. A similar phenomenon was also observed at room temperature but was attributed to the sample heating by the incident light. The results presented here demonstrate the potential of the phenomenon for application in the development of ferrite signal processing devices with dual tuning by both magnetic field and optical irradiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMagneto-Optical Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207