MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409168075 · doi:10.3390/curroncol32040214

Survivorship Considerations and Management in the Adolescent and Young Adult Sarcoma Population: A Review

2025· review· en· W4409168075 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anne Gunderson, Miriam Yun, Babe Westlake, Madeline Hardacre, Nicholas Manguso, Alicia A. Gingrich

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurvivorship curveSarcomaRadiation therapyPopulationFertility preservationSoft tissue sarcomaCancerIncidence (geometry)Intensive care medicinePediatricsFertilitySurgeryPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has an 2-8% incidence for all malignant tumors in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population, which are patients from ages 15 to 39. As most STS tumors are aggressive, they require multimodal management with surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. This article discusses the survivorship considerations in this young population of cancer patients who complete therapy. The lasting side effects include surgical and radiation-related morbidity, chemotherapy toxicity, early and late secondary effects on other organ systems, such as cardiac and endocrine dysfunction, and the development of secondary cancers. The long-term psychologic and practical impacts for those who have received a sarcoma diagnosis in the prime of their life include fertility, mental health, relationship, education and career implications. Although there is a paucity of data in some of these areas, we present existing management guidelines as available. This article serves as a comprehensive review of this wide array of treatment effects intended for all providers participating in the care of AYA sarcoma survivors, to include oncologists, primary care providers and therapists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Oncology→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→