MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409174680 · doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002577

Structured home-based exercise programme and concentric versus eccentric-based stair training programme for pain and function in knee osteoarthritis: a two-phase, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial protocol

2025· article· en· W4409174680 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
KS Hossain, Feroz Kabir, Sharmila Jahan, Ehsanur Rahman, K M Amran Hossain, Ambika Kormoker, Md Zahirul Islam, Md. Kabir Hossain, Jannatul Ferdous Rikti, Abid Hasan Khan, Md. Zahid Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJashore University of Science and Technology
KeywordsPhysical therapyWOMACOsteoarthritisMedicineRandomized controlled trialRange of motionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationQuality of life (healthcare)Knee painInternal medicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of pain and disability worldwide. While exercise is crucial for managing OA, the effectiveness of a well-structured and efficient home-based, self-management exercise programme remains unclear. Therefore, this two-phase randomised controlled trial will evaluate the effectiveness of a structured home-based exercise programme (HEP) and concentric-based stair training programme versus eccentric-based stair training programme (CSTP vs ESTP) to develop an evidence-based approach for knee OA. Methods and analysis This study will be a participant and assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial that will enrol 247 knee OA participants. In Phase I, there will be a 1:1 split of participants into: an HEP and a control group PI for 8 weeks. In Phase II, eligible participants from Phase I will be a 1:1:1 split into: a CSTP, an ESTP and a control group PII for another 8 weeks. The number of exercise programmes will last for 16 weeks, including a 24-week follow-up. The primary outcomes of pain intensity, pressure pain threshold and functional ability will be measured using a numeric pain rating scale, pressure algometer and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The secondary outcomes of muscle strength, range of motion, aerobic capacity and quality of life will be measured using a modified sphygmomanometer, universal goniometer, 6-minute walk test and 36-item short-form survey. All outcomes will be measured at pretest (T1), post-test (T2 and T3) and follow-up (T4). Ethics and dissemination All activities and exercise programmes will follow the Helsinki Declaration of 2020. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at international conferences. Trial registration number CTRI/2025/03/081574.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0100.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open Sport & Exercise MedicineSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207