MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409181063 · doi:10.18488/119.v7i1.4137

Developing the potential of work-based learning: New challenges in Thailand's TVET system and the public-private partnership at Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna

2025· article· en· W4409181063 on OpenAlexaff
Siriphorn Schlattmann

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Vocational Education and Training · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsCégep de Jonquière
FundersOffice of National Higher Education Science Research and Innovation Policy CouncilRajamangala University of Technology LannaStrong
KeywordsGeneral partnershipWork (physics)Public–private partnershipDeveloping countryBusinessEconomic growthEngineeringEconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the role of work-based learning (WBL) in meeting the evolving demands of Industry 4.0 and digital transformation within Thailand's Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) system. It assesses the current state of WBL implementation in Thai TVET and proposes models to enhance its effectiveness. Using a qualitative approach, the research focuses on two public-private partnership models at Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna (RMUTL): the school-in-factory (SiF) model and the Tripartite Education System. Insights were gathered through semi-structured interviews with five TVET experts, identifying key areas for WBL improvement. Despite increased recognition of WBL in Thailand, challenges remain, including limited industry engagement, inadequate infrastructure, and insufficient teacher training. The study emphasizes the need for stronger public-private partnerships, greater industry participation, and ongoing enhancement of WBL programs. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, educators, researchers, and industry leaders in Thailand and the ASEAN region. By advancing effective WBL models, such as the SiF model and the Tripartite Education System, Thailand can cultivate a skilled workforce essential for economic growth and innovation. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of ongoing evaluation and improvement to ensure that WBL programs remain relevant and effective in the dynamic context of Industry 4.0.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Vocational Education and TrainingSame topicHigher Education Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207