Hybrid Battery and Sensible Thermal Energy Storage for a Microgrid in a Remote Indigenous Canadian Community
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Decarbonization of remote northern Indigenous communities requires integration of renewable generation into existing fossil‐fueled energy systems. As these systems approach complete decarbonization, energy storage technologies become increasingly critical. We investigate the impact of battery and sensible thermal energy storage systems in the context of decarbonizing both electrical and thermal loads for the Xeni Gwet'in remote community in British Columbia, Canada. Two scenarios are modeled and compared with renewable energy fractions ranging from 60% to 100%. The two systems modeled include wind and solar electricity generation combined with either: (1) a battery energy storage system, or (2) a hybridized battery and sensible thermal energy storage system. Scenarios are evaluated according to levelized cost of energy to present the techno‐economic impacts of hybridized storage at varying levels of decarbonization. Technical considerations of coupling battery and sensible thermal energy storage, including market readiness, operation and maintenance, and impact on grid performance, are also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it