Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proposed mechanism of compartmentalization and self-replication via an RNA condensate: (1) condensation, (2) RNA-templated polymerization (green arrows) and growth, and (3) division. • RNA condensates may have served as self-replicating catalysts for the origin of life and the RNA World. • RNA condensates formed by short RNAs lower the error threshold and unify replication and compartmentalization. • RNA condensates may spontaneously begin a ‘condensate chain reaction’ leading to natural selection. • Within a standard polymer physics framework, key parameters for the model are defined. • These hypotheses about the origin of life can readily be tested by experiment or simulation. The RNA World hypothesis predicts that self-replicating RNAs evolved before DNA genomes and coded proteins. Despite widespread support for the RNA World, self-replicating RNAs have yet to be identified in a natural context, leaving a key ‘missing link’ for this explanation of the origin of life. Inspired by recent work showing that condensates of charged polymers are capable of catalyzing chemical reactions, we consider a catalytic RNA condensate as a candidate for the self-replicating RNA. Specifically, we propose that short, low-complexity RNA polymers formed catalytic condensates capable of templated RNA polymerization. Because the condensate properties depend on the RNA sequences, RNAs that formed condensates with improved polymerization and demixing capacity would be amplified, leading to a ‘condensate chain reaction’ and evolution by natural selection. Many of the needed properties of this self-replicating RNA condensate have been realized experimentally in recent studies and our predictions could be tested with current experimental and theoretical tools. Our theory addresses central problems in the origins of life: (i) the origin of compartmentalization, (ii) the error threshold for the accuracy of templated replication, (iii) the free energy cost of maintaining an information-rich population of replicating RNA polymers. Furthermore, we note that the extant nucleolus appears to satisfy many of the requirements of an evolutionary relic for the model we propose. More generally, we suggest that future work on the origin of life would benefit from condensate-centric biophysical models of RNA evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".