Phase assemblage and microstructure of burnt oil shale-containing blended cements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Burnt oil shale (BOS), obtained from the combustion of oil shale, is a promising supplementary cementitious material (SCM) based on its chemistry and mineralogy. This paper summarizes the use of BOS and its hydration in blended cements. It presents new data on the effect of combinations of alkali activators and Ca(NO 3 ) 2 in blended cements containing 50 % Portland cement (OPC) where BOS is combined with limestone, fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag. These chemical admixtures increase the slope of the correlation between compressive strength and heat of hydration of BOS containing mixes, providing an increase in compressive strength from 1 to 7 days for similar heat release to the control system. In contrast, the slope is not affected in absence of BOS. The change is due to a higher volume of hydrates from BOS increased hydration for a given C 3 S degree of hydration, likely from a less exothermic dissolution of BOS amorphous component. These admixtures increase the reactivity of both BOS and OPC at different curing times and depending on the type of alkali activator. They promote ettringite and portlandite precipitation, inducing a refinement of the microstructure, particularly around BOS particles. The information presented should pave the way to a broader and more effective use of BOS in blended cements with particularly low clinker contents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".