MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409197152 · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1434578

Effect of the transpulmonary pressure on the lungs’ vibroacoustic response: a first numerical perspective

2025· article· en· W4409197152 on OpenAlexaff
Arife Uzundurukan, Sébastien Poncet, Daria C. Boffito, Philippe Micheau

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Digital Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranspulmonary pressurePerspective (graphical)MedicineMathematicsInternal medicineLungLung volumes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the high-stakes environment of intensive care units (ICUs), managing transpulmonary pressure is crucial for providing breathing assistance to intubated patients, particularly when combining this intervention with respiratory therapy, such as high-frequency chest compression (HFCC). Despite the complexity of lung tissues, a computed tomography-based finite element model (CT-FEM), guided by Biot's theory, can be employed to numerically predict their vibroacoustic behavior at low frequencies, where the properties of the lungs align with the theory's principles. In this work, one aims to develop an analytical model of the lungs for two different levels of transpulmonary pressure—10 cm H 2 O (inflated lungs) and 20 cm H 2 O (healthy lungs)—to examine the poroviscoelastic behavior of the lungs and evaluate the generated analytical model using a CT-FEM of the human thorax like a digital twin of the human thorax. Biot's theory was utilized to predict the complex-valued shear wave speed, as well as the fast and slow compression wave speeds, across a frequency range between 5 and 100 Hz. The analytically computed values were tested using a previously validated CT-FEM of the human thorax to compare respiratory therapy outcomes for intubated patients under different transpulmonary pressure levels. Besides the frequency response function of the thorax, the kinetic energy density and the strain energy density were compared for these pressure levels. The CT-FEM demonstrated that all peak points fall within the range of 20–45 Hz; therefore, this range might be considered in ICUs settings. Kinetic energy density was nearly 2.2 times higher, and strain energy density was 1.46–1.26 times higher at the first and last peaks, respectively; therefore, inflated lungs experienced greater effects than healthy ones under the same respiratory therapy conditions. Overall, this study highlights how different transpulmonary pressures affect HFCC therapy, offering insights into gentle and effective conditions for intubated patients in ICUs while revealing the lungs’ 3D responses by integrating analytically predicted shear wave speed, fast and slow compression wave speeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Digital HealthSame topicPhonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207